Dividing a Business in a Divorce

Oftentimes in a divorce, one of the assets that the family court in Pennsylvania must decide how to distribute is a business.  In most instances, the Court is not distributing or dividing the control of the business but rather the value. If the business is premarital, the increase in value during the marriage is considered for purposes of the divorce.  In order to determine the value of the business, the parties can either stipulate to the value or they will need what is known as a business valuation.  There are generally three different methods used to value a business and one method or a combination may be appropriate depending on the type of business.  If the spouse who does not control the assets needs to get a business valued, it may be necessary to petition the court during the course of the divorce to request the other spouse to advance the cost of the business valuation.  A business valuation is neither simple nor inexpensive.  

Due to the cost of a business valuation, some parties make the mistake and assume the business does not have any value.  While that may be true in some cases if the business is solely due to the efforts of the spouse, two questions to consider are 1) whether the business has any hard, physical assets that could be liquidated or sold and 2) whether the business could be successfully sold to a third party.  If the answer to either of those questions is a yes, then there is some value to the business.

Depending on the value of the business and other assets of the marriage will determine how the business factors into the distribution.  If an offset with other assets can be accomplished, it may be best to do an offset of the value.  In cases where the business is the most valuable asset, a structured buyout will be necessary.  This may involve a combination of a lumpsum and payments over time.

For more information see:

/Family-Law-Divorce/Divorce-Involving-Business-Owners-the-Self-Employed/

by

Fair Rental Value

The issue of fair rental value arises where one spouse is no longer living in the marital residence pending finalization of a divorce action. The principle behind fair rental value is that the spouse that has moved out of the former marital residence still has a ½ interest in the property and accordingly, should be compensated for their interest. The court must consider a number of items in reaching an appropriate calculation of any rental credit due. First, the court must determine if there are any equitable defenses that should offset the total of any rental credit due. Second, the court must consider the length of the dispossession. Case law also establishes that the other spouse must be in actual possession of the home.

Finally, the court must calculate the total amount of credit for expenses paid on the home. These expenses would include the mortgage payments and other ordinary expenses related to the home. Similar to any rental credit due, expenses should be split in half to reflect each party’s ownership interest. If the rental value exceeds the expenses related to the home, the spouse that has left the home should get a credit for ½ of the rental value offset by the expenses. An argument for fair rental value is most likely to occur where the home is owned outright such that no mortgage payments are made or there are relatively small monthly payments on any debt associated with the house compared to what the home could rent for.

Click here to read more about equitable distribution.

by

Survivor Benefits

Survivor benefits refer to the benefit that can be paid to the selected beneficiary following the death of the employee. This type of benefit is most frequently available in the context of a pension plan. A survivor benefit is a marital asset that should be addressed in the context of a divorce. Additionally, the survivor benefit is a separate asset than the pension itself such that a spouse could receive a portion of the actual pension as well as the survivor beneficiary designation. The employee may need to choose whether they want to establish a survivor benefit at the time of retirement. The election of a survivor benefit can result in the reduction of the benefit the employee will receive during their lifetime.

Even if an employee does not elect a survivor benefit, in certain cases it can still be established through court order. A Qualified Domestic Relations Order may be necessary to establish the award of a survivor benefit. Whether or not the award of a survivor benefit is appropriate likely depends on if there is an offset for the interest in the pension or a deferred distribution. With an offset, the employee keeps their entire pension and the other party is awarded other assets such that the parties still achieve an equitable distribution. With a deferred distribution, where the spouse of the employee will be receiving an actual portion of the pension but not until the employee retires, the survivor benefit can act as an insurance policy to ensure the spouse will receive some benefit from the pension even if the employee dies prior to retirement. The best course of action is to obtain and review all plan documents on the retirement/pension and any prior elections of the employee as a first step in determining how to reach an equitable distribution and what options are at your disposal.

Click here to read more on equitable distribution.

by

Retirement Plan Distributions in Divorce

Retirement plans are often one of the significant assets up for distribution in the course of a divorce. Careful attention should be given to the type of retirement plan at issue to avoid tax penalties and/or early withdrawal penalties to the extent possible. First, retirement plans must be distinguished between qualified plans and non-qualified plans. Qualified plans include defined contribution plans such as 401Ks as well as defined benefit plans such as pensions. A Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) will be necessary to distribute a qualified plan. Non-qualified plans include individual retirement accounts or IRAs. A QDRO is not needed to distribute these plans.

Both qualified and non-qualified plans will be taxable as distributed. The QDRO effectuates a tax-free rollover of funds to the spouse being awarded a share of the retirement plan in divorce but the spouse will be taxed on it when they withdraw it. Distributions outside of a QDRO may also be subject to an early withdrawal fee. Typically, a 10% early withdrawal penalty applies to distributions before the plan participant is 59 ½ years old. There are a few ways to avoid the early withdrawal penalty including a loan from the retirement plan, disability of the plan participant, and scheduled equal payments. Additional exceptions for IRA plans include higher education expenses and for first-time home buyers.

Click here to read more on distribution of retirement accounts.

by

Increase/Decrease in Asset Value

Property acquired prior to the marriage or in exchange for said property is not marital however the increase in value of that property during the marriage is up for distribution. Pursuant to 23 Pa. C.S. §3501(a)(1), any increase in value for non-marital or separate property should be measured from the date of marriage or date of acquisition through the date of separation or date close to the equitable distribution hearing, whichever date results in a lesser increase. This provision is intended to protect the party with the interest in the non-marital property in situations where there may be a lengthy time period between when the parties separate and when they get to the point of dividing the property.

Section 3501(a)(1) also discusses the potential for offsets in any increase in non-marital property by a decrease in non-marital property. Accordingly, if Wife had an increase in non-marital property as well as a decrease in non-marital property of the same amount, the two occurrences would cancel each other out. However, if the increase is greater than the decrease, the increase would be reduced by the extent of the decrease for a net value. This rule applies to the non-marital property of each spouse. In other words, Wife’s increased value in non-marital property can only be offset by her decreased value in non-marital property, not Husband’s, and vice versa.

Click here to read more on equitable distribution.

by

Non-Marital Property

Section 3501 of the Divorce Code defines what will be considered marital property versus what will be considered non-marital property. Specifically, marital property will include all property acquired by either party from the date of marriage through the date of separation. There is a presumption all property acquired during the marriage is marital regardless of how title is held (e.g. individually vs. jointly). It will also include the increase of value of any non-marital property during the course of the marriage. 23 Pa C.S. 3501 goes on to list what property will not be considered marital under the statute. Property acquired prior to the marriage or in exchange for said property is not marital as well as property expressly excluded by valid written agreement of the parties at any time.

Property received as a gift from any person other than the other spouse is not marital along with any property acquired after final separation but potentially prior to the entry of a divorce decree as long as marital property was not used in its acquisition. Any inheritance received is treated as a gift and will also be deemed non-marital so long as it is not subsequently commingled with marital funds. The court will also not look at property that was disposed of in good faith while the marriage was intact. An example would be property sold to a family member for its fair market value. Veterans’ benefits cannot be attached, levied or seized except in the case where a portion of the veteran’s retirement pay was waived in exchange for the benefits. Finally, any payment from a cause of action or lawsuit where the underlying claim occurred before the marriage or after separation.

Click here to read more on Equitable Distribution.

by

New Rules for Montgomery County

Montgomery County has just adopted a number of changes to their local rules regarding divorce matters. Where there are pending claims for equitable distribution, the moving party should file a Motion for Entry of Grounds and Appointment of an Equitable Distribution Master. The moving party will now have to pay a $400 fee at the time the Motion is filed. The Motion should certify that all discovery is complete. A list of all the assets and debts at issue along with their corresponding values must also be included. Finally, the initial pre-hearing statement should be attached including a completed Inventory and Appraisement. Once the Motion and all its required accompaniments are filed, a copy of the same should be served on the other party. A Certificate of Service should then be completed and filed with the court.

The non-moving party has forty-five (45) days from the date of service to file their own pre-hearing statement and Inventory and Appraisement. Similarly, a copy should be served on the moving party and a Certificate of Service should be filed with the court. The non-moving party must also certify that all discovery is complete and include a list of all assets and debts with values as of the date of filing the certification. The failure of either party to comply the Rule may result in sanctions including the disallowance of testimony or introduction of evidence at the time of the equitable distribution proceedings from the party that failed to comply. Where equitable distribution, alimony or counsel fees is not at issue or has settled by agreement and grounds have been established, the moving party can file a praecipe to transmit the record for divorce decree.

Click here to read more on Equitable Distribution.

by

Vanishing Credit

The court may give credit for individual property brought into the marriage depending on the circumstances. Generally, any credit to be received decreases with the length of the marriage. For example, Bucks County will reduce the credit by 5% a year such that there is no longer a credit after 20 years. A prime example of a situation where this rule would be applicable is the purchase of a marital home. Say Spouse A contributed $40,000 of their pre-marital money to the purchase of the house. If the parties separated after 5 years, the amount of Spouse A’s individual contribution is reduced by 25%. Accordingly, Spouse A would argue that 75% of the $40,000 down payment, or $30,000, is their separate property and not subject to equitable distribution in the divorce.

The rules on credit for individual or pre-marital property can vary county to county since it’s not a statute, but more or less a policy used by the respective Masters when looking at the marital estate in a divorce matter. Be careful with the commingling of individual property with marital property. It will be hard to make an argument on the amount of individual property that should be credited to a party if it’s hard to trace the source of the funds. If you encounter a situation in your divorce where it may be necessary to make a distinction between assets that are clearly marital versus those that you can trace back as being pre-marital and/or separate, you should be sure to consult with an attorney with experience in the valuation of these type of assets or risk all of the assets being addressed in equitable distribution and subject to division with your spouse.

Click here to read more on dividing marital property in divorce.

by

Disability Pension

Pensions are generally considered marital property and subject to distribution at the time of divorce. The pension may need to be appraised to determine the marital value of the pension, specifically in an instance where the party began accruing the benefits prior to the marriage or the parties were separated for numerous years before a divorce action was commenced. There are also retirement benefits that are excluded from equitable distribution. For example, under 23 Pa. C.S. 3501(a)(6), veterans’ benefits are excluded from equitable distribution.

Other disability benefits besides veterans’ benefits may also be excluded from equitable distribution. The key is to consider the purpose of the benefit and whether it is being used to compensate for lost income. In other words, if the purpose of the benefits is to provide earnings in lieu of what the recipient would’ve made were they still able to work, those benefits will not be subject to distribution. If, however, a portion of the benefit also includes standard retirement benefits, the portion representing retirement benefits will still be subject to distribution.

Click here to read more on division of marital property.

by

Factors in Equitable Distribution

Equitable distribution is the term used in Pennsylvania referring to division of marital property at the time of divorce. Marital property will consist of nearly everything acquired in either party’s name from the date of marriage through to the date of separation. Equitable distribution does not necessarily mean a 50/50 split of all marital property. Instead, the statute on equitable distribution sets out 13 factors to be considered. Those factors are listed in 23 Pa C.S. 3502 and include the following:

(1) Length of the marriage; (2) Any prior marriage of either party; (3) Age, health, station, amount and sources of income, vocational skills, employability, estate, liabilities and needs of each of the parties; (4) Contribution by one party to the education, training or increased earning capacity of the other party; (5) Opportunity of each party for future acquisitions of capital assets and income; (6) Sources of income of both parties, including but not limited to, medical, retirement, insurance or other benefits; (7) The contribution or dissipation of each party in the acquisition, preservation, depreciation or appreciation of the marital property, including the contribution of a party as a homemaker; (8) Value of the property set apart to each party

(9) Standard of living of the parties established during the marriage; (10) Economic circumstances of each party at the time the division of property is to become effective; (10.1) Federal, State and local tax ramifications associated with each asset to be divided, distributed or assigned, which ramifications need not be immediate and certain; (10.2) Expense of sale, transfer or liquidation associated with a particular asset, which expenses need not be immediate and certain; (11) Whether the party will be serving as the custodian of any dependent minor children

The remainder of 23 Pa C.S. 3502 goes on to discuss the courts powers relating to who can reside in the marital home pending the divorce, maintaining life insurance policies, interim partial distributions, and enforcement powers in the event of contempt of a court order on equitable distribution. Parties should keep these factors in mind when fashioning a settlement agreement of their own. If the parties have to go to court for equitable distribution, they will be required to submit a statement beforehand laying out what they allege is the marital property at issue, how the factors listed affect their case, and what they are ultimately seeking as an “equitable” distribution.

Click here to read more on Equitable Distribution.

by